Other LanguagesAgency's use-of-force policy is consistent with the AGO model policy:
No
Why agency's use-of force policy departs from the AGO model policy:
It does not technically depart from the AGO model policy, as most of what was written in the AGO model policy is outlined in our Use of Force Policy, it just no longer specifically states we adhere to the AGO model policy.
Reasons for departing from the AGO model policy:
Collaboration with Stakeholders: In developing our policy, I have consulted with our AAG, as well as reviewed BPD’s and Eastern Washington University’s Use of Force Policies - both accredited agencies.
Unique Environment: Our agency operates within a higher education setting, within the City of Bellingham. The officers’ working schedule was recently changed to mirror that of the Bellingham Police Department. This allows for our agency to consistently train with their agency. This is beneficial to us in many ways – save resources, build trust and partnerships, utilize same tactics and techniques. This is important as our two agencies regularly respond to the same calls near campus and when additional assistance is needed on campus.
The Bellingham Police Department is accredited through the Washington Association of Chief’s of Police, and we are not accredited through any organization. The Bellingham Police Department Use of Force Policy does not state they follow the AGO model policy.
Because of what is mentioned above, to avoid violations of law or confusion between agencies, mirroring the Bellingham Use of Force Policy will only strengthen the requirement for duty to intervene or supervisor notification because of a policy violation. Both agencies would be working under the same/similar policy and have an understanding when a fellow officer is in violation.
One such area where there could be confusion is it common practice to search buildings that have been burglarized with a weapon out at the low ready. The AGO model policy would not allow this practice (page 13 under (3) Pointing and Drawing a Firearm. BPD and UPD have the potential to be together on a call such as this, and officers need to be able to respond in a safe tactical manner.
Reasons for departing from the AGO model policy:
Collaboration with Stakeholders: In developing our policy, I have consulted with our AAG, as well as reviewed BPD’s and Eastern Washington University’s Use of Force Policies - both accredited agencies.
Unique Environment: Our agency operates within a higher education setting, within the City of Bellingham. The officers’ working schedule was recently changed to mirror that of the Bellingham Police Department. This allows for our agency to consistently train with their agency. This is beneficial to us in many ways – save resources, build trust and partnerships, utilize same tactics and techniques. This is important as our two agencies regularly respond to the same calls near campus and when additional assistance is needed on campus.
The Bellingham Police Department is accredited through the Washington Association of Chief’s of Police, and we are not accredited through any organization. The Bellingham Police Department Use of Force Policy does not state they follow the AGO model policy.
Because of what is mentioned above, to avoid violations of law or confusion between agencies, mirroring the Bellingham Use of Force Policy will only strengthen the requirement for duty to intervene or supervisor notification because of a policy violation. Both agencies would be working under the same/similar policy and have an understanding when a fellow officer is in violation.
One such area where there could be confusion is it common practice to search buildings that have been burglarized with a weapon out at the low ready. The AGO model policy would not allow this practice (page 13 under (3) Pointing and Drawing a Firearm. BPD and UPD have the potential to be together on a call such as this, and officers need to be able to respond in a safe tactical manner.
How agency's use-of-force policy is consistent with RCW 10.120.020:
Our policy does not deviate from RCW 10.120.020 and is outlined in our policy as it is in the RCW.
We also ensured our policy outlined the following:
Duty to Intervene: Our policy includes a duty for officers to intervene if they witness excessive use of force, ensuring accountability and fostering a culture of professionalism.
Proportional Response: Our policy emphasizes the importance of using force only when necessary and in a manner that is proportional to the threat or resistance encountered.
De-escalation Training: Our policy requires de-escalation training, equipping officers with the skills to resolve situations effectively without resorting to the use of force when possible.
We also ensured our policy outlined the following:
Duty to Intervene: Our policy includes a duty for officers to intervene if they witness excessive use of force, ensuring accountability and fostering a culture of professionalism.
Proportional Response: Our policy emphasizes the importance of using force only when necessary and in a manner that is proportional to the threat or resistance encountered.
De-escalation Training: Our policy requires de-escalation training, equipping officers with the skills to resolve situations effectively without resorting to the use of force when possible.
Date policy last updated: