Navigation Top
AGO Logo Graphic
AGO Header Image
File a Complaint
Contact the AGO
AGO Opinions with Topic: MEDICINE
AGO 1988 No. 28 >  November 14, 1988
OPTOMETRY 1.An agreement between an optometrist and an ophthalmologist whereby the optometrist refers a patient to the ophthalmologist for surgery with the understanding that the referring optometrist will provide post-operative care does not violate the anti-rebate provisions of chapter 19.68 RCW or RCW 18.130.180(21), so long as each party performs services he or she is licensed to perform and bills only for those services.2.The Medical Disciplinary Board lacks authority to prohibit ophthalmologists from delegating post-operative management of eye surgery patients to optometrists, if the prohibition amounts to an effort to regulate the practice of optometry or to prevent optometrists from performing functions they are licensed to perform; however, the Medical Disciplinary Board does have authority to define the scope of post-operative care and define the extent of a medical doctor's responsibility for such post-operative care.
AGO 1992 No. 30 >  December 22, 1992
Applicability of RCW 19.68.010 to Referrals for Infusion Therapy 1.  RCW 19.68.010 prohibits a person licensed to practice medicine in Washington from receiving a rebate, commission, or other consideration in connection with the referral of a patient.  RCW 19.68.040 provides that a licensed physician is not prohibited from collecting compensation for services provided by an employee.2.  RCW 19.68.010 prohibits a physician from referring a patient to an infusion therapy company in which the physician is a shareholder.  However, under RCW 19.68.040 this prohibition would not apply if the persons performing the services for the infusion therapy company are under the control of the physician such that they are employees of the physician.3.  RCW 19.68.010 does not prohibit a physician from receiving a set fee from an infusion therapy company for providing various services to the company's customers.  However, the fees must actually provide the services, and the fee paid must reflect the market value of the services provided.
AGLO 1977 No. 3 >  January 12, 1977
CHIROPRACTORS ‑- MEDICINE ‑- SURGERY AND OSTEOPATHY ‑- LEGALITY OF CERTAIN ACTIVITIES BY CHIROPRACTORS It is not lawful for a chiropractor, as such, to make a medical diagnosis, to use medical electrotherapies such as ultrasound, diathermy and galvanic current as a form of treatment in the course of his practice, or to prescribe electrotherapy or to use electrotherapy on a patient pursuant to a prescription from a medical doctor.
AGO 2012 No. 7 >  November 20, 2012
Application Of RCW 19.68.010 To Donations For Electronic Health Record RCW 19.68.010, Washington’s anti-rebate statute, precludes a donation by a clinical laboratory to a physician for the purpose of paying a portion of the cost of software for the physician’s electronic health record system, in connection with the receiving physician either continuing or establishing a referral arrangement with the donating laboratory.
Content Bottom Graphic
AGO Logo