Navigation Top
AGO Logo Graphic
AGO Header Image
File a Complaint
Contact the AGO
AGO Opinions with Topic: COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT
AGO 1991 No. 32 >  November 8, 1991
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT - APPOINTMENT
Appointment of alternate members to Commission on Judicial Conduct RCW 2.64.030 provides that the appointing authority may appoint alternate members to the Commission on Judicial Conduct to serve during a member's temporary disability, disqualification or inability to serve.  This statute provides for the appointment of one alternate for each Commission member, which alternate is paired with that member.  The appointing authority cannot appoint a pool of alternate members who could serve in some rotation fashion.
AGO 1988 No. 23 >  October 20, 1988
JUDGES - CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS - COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS 1.The Commission on Judicial Conduct is not required to make public informal admonishments of judges, unless such informal admonishments arise out of a hearing or proceeding required by law to be public.2.When a judge waives confidentiality as to an investigation by the Commission on Judicial Conduct, the law requires the fact that there is an investigation to be made public; however, the Commission retains authority to determine whether other aspects of the investigation will be kept confidential.
AGO 1999 No. 4 >  May 12, 1999
CONSTITUTION - JUDGES - COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Authority of Commission on Judicial Conduct to separate investigative and adjudicatory functions 1. The Commission on Judicial Conduct lacks authority to divide its members into separate investigatory and adjudicative panels.   2. It is not a “temporary disability, disqualification, or inability to serve” for a member of the Commission on Judicial Conduct to have participated in the investigative phase of a complaint or case; this fact would not justify empaneling the member's alternative to serve in his/her place during the adjudicative phase of the same proceeding.   3. The Commission on Judicial Conduct may not use its alternative members to serve as “permanent” members as part of a scheme to divide the Commission into investigatory and adjudicative panels; the constitution evidences an intent that the same body exercise both functions.
Content Bottom Graphic
AGO Logo