Navigation Top
AGO Logo Graphic
AGO Header Image
File a Complaint
Contact the AGO
In General
Return to In General
Civil injunctions another tool in fight against gangs

Civil injunctions another tool in fight against gangs

(AGO, Crime, Gangs) Permanent link

An interesting editorial has been published by the Yakima Herald. It talks about a frightening gang-related weapons seizure:

Cop carHere's just a glimpse of what was taken during the drug-related arrest: a MAC-11 machine-gun pistol, several AK-47s, homemade silencers, shortened AR-15 rifles and shotguns. The total: 33 guns. Don't forget the three pipe bombs and a bag full of rolled-up $100 bills totaling thousands of dollars.

The editorial goes on to talk about the prevalence of gangs in the area:

In the city of Yakima, officials believe there are at least 500 gang members. Countywide, the numbers rise to 2,000. Nationwide, a district attorney's association claims there are 30,000 gangs with 800,000 members.

It also touches on AG McKenna's recent trip to Yakima, where he spoke about the idea of civil injunctions targeted against known gang members:

An injunction is a court order that seeks to stop individuals or organizations from preventing the general public from enjoying life and property. Popularized in California, an anti-gang civil injunction goes one step further and is directed at criminal street gangs. These gangs can be targeted because they are an identifiable group due to their colors and other signs. The injunction enables police to detain gang members and stop them from associating in a defined area like a neighborhood.

Let's say a homeowner feels threatened by the presence of a nearby gang whose members gather at a street corner near the home. An injunction could be used to clear them out so the homeowner could once again enjoy sitting on his or her porch or front stoop.

It's an intriguing tool to fight potential gang violence. Of course, these injunctions must be directed at gang members whose activities are ongoing and are occurring within a defined location. Members of the gang must also be served first with the injunction before it can be enforced. That may prove to be a tough proposition.

But McKenna vows to push ahead with civil injunctions and prepare a measure for state lawmakers to consider when they reconvene in January. Here, the county prosecutor has already been looking into these California-style injunctions.

While a civil injunction may not have the firepower of those weapons seized several weeks ago, it can provide a different kind of ammunition -- the ability to detain known gang members and get them off the streets.

It's not a cure-all, but it's certainly another means of dampening gang activity and the violence that it spawns. If it leads to reclaiming just one neighborhood, it's worth the effort.

Read the full editorial on the Yakima Herald's web site.


Posted by Public Affairs Unit at 08/21/2009 05:15:30 PM | 

Recent article from WA. D.C. on gang injunc.
If this is what we are looking at I see BIG PROBLEMS! And will not support gang injunc. These are quotes from
“Gang injunctions accomplish a short-cut around the protection of the criminal justice system. It allows the attorney general to sentence people who he determines are gang members to a lifetime sentence of probation, without the right to an attorney, without the right to a trial before a jury, and without the right to confront your accusers in court,”
The legislation would prohibit young people from associating with other people on the list in public, including their own family, say at a barbecue if they have a cousin who is also on the injunction list. More importantly, they cannot even go to ‘anti-gang’ programs because there may be people in that program whose names are also on the injunction list,” The Fenty legislation would also have prohibited any person on the injunction list from entering an establishment unless they had expressed written permission of the owners. For Ron Hampton, a retired veteran of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and Executive Director of the National Black Police Association, the legislation spells disaster for police-community relations. “This legislation does nothing, in my opinion, but criminalizes young people. We ought to be doing more to keep them out of the criminal justice system than trying to put them in it,” said Hampton.
Personally, Christine speaking, my concern also is for the judicial system which has already been chopped down to nothing. Where is the money going to come from to inforce these injunctions? How will you house these g-members, as prisons and beds will be cut. I for one am interesterd in seeing the proposal in writing, all the gibber jabber of injunctions seems like a pacification to the public. Are you really spelling out to them what your true intentions are.? We want to help these young people and their families, how will these injunctions help an already oppressed people?
Posted by: Christine Pelayo ( Email ) at 10/15/2009 12:14 PM

Leave a comment
Name *
Email *

All comments are reviewed to ensure compliance with our Blog Comment and Use Policy. Comments are generally posted within two business days. Send Feedback
Content Bottom Graphic
AGO Logo