Navigation Top
AGO Logo Graphic
AGO Header Image
File a Complaint
Contact the AGO
All Consuming
Return to main blog
Too much of a good thing: Julia Roberts’ airbrushed face banned in the UK

Too much of a good thing: Julia Roberts’ airbrushed face banned in the UK

(Everything Else) Permanent link

Does an airbrushed actress constitute illegal advertising? A UK watchdog agency thinks so.

Two magazine ads for cosmetics giant L'Oreal -- one for Lancome’s Teint Miracle foundation featuring Julia Roberts and the other using model Christy Turlington for Maybelline’s Eraser foundation -- have been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority, reports The Guardian newspaper and others.

"Excessive airbrushing and digital manipulation techniques have become the norm, but both Christy Turlington and Julia Roberts are naturally beautiful women who don't need retouching to look great,” said the member of Parliament who brought the ad to regulators' attention. “This ban sends a powerful message to advertisers – let's get back to reality."

The ASA made its decision without the help of before and after shots. Roberts reportedly stipulated in her contract that no unairbrushed shots can be released, say news sources. Instead, the authority received red carpet shots of both Roberts and Turlington.

L’Oreal defended itself, admitting the photos were retouched. But the company pointed to Turlington’s pores and crow's feet and maintained that the image "accurately illustrated" achieveable results. Pretty Woman star Roberts' flawless, glowing skin was attributed to a combination of natural beauty and a talented photographer.

The ASA acknowledged that Julia Roberts was an actress “well known for her beauty” and “pictures supplied from laboratory testing were evidence that the product was capable of improving skin’s appearance.”  But, the agency wrote, “we could not conclude that the ad image accurately illustrated what effect the product could achieve, and that the image had not been exaggerated by digital post production techniques. We therefore concluded the ad was misleading.”

In 2007, the ASA lashed out at L'Oreal for a mascara ad featuring Penelope Cruz that claimed to deliver "up to 60% longer lashes." Turns out Cruz was wearing false lashes.

As someone who has tried many makeup products, I’ve found the only “miracle” is Photoshop.


Posted by Kristin Alexander All Consuming Blog Moderator at 07/27/2011 10:33:01 AM | 

I think that they are carrying this just a little to far by banning Julia. I have seen much worse than this, matter fact we all see much worse than this on a daily basis. This has nothing to do with fact that Julia Roberts is my favorite actress (haha)
Posted by: Pete Fredrickson ( Email ) at 8/3/2011 1:59 AM

Leave a comment
Name *
Email *

All comments are reviewed to ensure compliance with our Blog Comment and Use Policy. Comments are generally posted within two business days. Send Feedback
Content Bottom Graphic
AGO Logo